Morality and Ethics and Computers

Published: 29th April 2010
Views: N/A

There are many different sides to the discussion on moral and ethical uses of

computers. In many situations, the morality of a particular use of a computer is up to the

individual to decide. For this reason, absolute laws about ethical computer usage is

almost, but not entirely, impossible to define.

The introduction of computers into the workplace has introduced many questions

as well: Should employers make sure the workplace is designed to minimize health risks

such as back strain and carpal tunnel syndrome for people who work with computers?

Can employers prohibit employees from sending personal memos by electronic mail to a

friend at the other side of the office? Should employers monitor employees' work on

computers? If so, should employees be warned beforehand? If warned, does that make

the practice okay? According to Kenneth Goodman, director of the Forum for Bioethics

and Philosophy at the University of Miami, who teaches courses in computer ethics,

"There's hardly a business that's not using computers."1 This makes these questions all

the more important for today's society to answer.

There are also many moral and ethical problems dealing with the use of computers

in the medical field. In one particular case, a technician trusted what he thought a

computer was telling him, and administered a deadly dose of radiation to a hospital

patient.2 In cases like these, it is difficult to decide who's fault it is. It could have been the

computer programmer's fault, but Goodman asks, "How much responsibility can you place

on a machine?"3

Many problems also occur when computers are used in education. Should

computers replace actual teachers in the classroom? In some schools, computers and

computer manuals have already started to replace teachers. I would consider this an

unethical use of computers because computers do not have the ability to think and interact

on an interpersonal basis.

Computers "dehumanize human activity"4 by taking away many jobs and making

many others "boring exercises in pushing the buttons that make the technology work." 5

Complete privacy is almost impossible in this computer age. By using a credit card

or check cashing card, entering a raffle, or subscribing to a magazine, people provide

information about themselves that can be sold to marketers and distributed to data bases

throughout the world. When people use the world-wide web, the sites they visit and

download things from, make a record that can be traced back to the person.6 This is not

protected, as it is when books are checked out of a library. Therefore, information about

someone's personal preferences and interests can be sold to anyone. A health insurance

company could find out if a particular person had bought alcohol or cigarettes and charge

that person a higher rate because he or she is a greater health risk. Although something

like this has not been reported yet, there are no laws against it, at this point.

More and more data base companies are monitoring individuals with little

regulation. "Other forms of monitoring-such as genetic screening-could eventually be

used to discriminate against individuals not because of their past but because of statistical

expectations about their future."7 For instance, people who do not have AIDS but carry

the antibodies are being discharged from the U.S. military and also fired from some jobs.

Who knows if this kind of medical information could lead employers to make decisions of

employment based on possible future illnesses rather than on job qualifications. Is this an

ethical use of computers?

One aspect of computers that is surely immoral and unethical is computer crime,

which has been on the rise lately. There are many different types of computer crime.

Three main types of crimes are making computer viruses, making illegal copies of

software, and actually stealing computers.

Computer viruses have been around for a decade but they became infamous when

the Michelangelo virus caused a scare on March 6, 1992. According to the National

Computer Security Association in Carlisle, Pennsylvania, there are 6000 known viruses

worldwide and about 200 new ones show up every month.8 These viruses are spread

quickly and easily and can destroy all information on a computer's hard drive. Now,

people must buy additional software just to detect viruses and possibly repair infected

files.

Making illegal copies of software is also a growing problem in the computer

world. Most people find no problem in buying a computer program and giving a copy to

their friend or co-worker. Some people even make copies and sell them to others.

Software companies are starting to require computer users to type in a code before using

the software. They do this in many ways. Sometimes, they require you to use a "code

wheel" or look in a book for the code. The software companies go through this trouble to

discourage people from making illegal copies because every copy that is made is money

the company lost.

One other thing that is just starting to become a problem is actual computer theft.

With the introduction of notebook computers came a rise in computer theft. The same

qualities that make these computers perfect for business travelers-their small size and light

weight- make them very easy for thieves to steal as well. In 1994, 295,000 computers

were reported stolen with resulting losses totaling over 981 million dollars. 9 The amount

lost to theft is about twice the amount lost in all forms of computer malfunction or

breakage.

The biggest news related to computers lately seems to always be about the

Internet. The Internet began decades ago, but is just becoming popular with the general

public now that technology is advancing and becoming cheaper. There are many aspects

of the Internet that can lead people into discussions concerning morality and ethics.

Much of the discussion of the Internet has to do with freedom of speech and the

First Amendment. Most Americans probably believe that the First Amendment is moral

because it is a national law. The problems arise because different people interpret the First

Amendment in different ways. In most cases since 1776, the First Amendment has been

easily defined and understood, but every once in a while, a situation appears which blurs

the lines. The Internet has caused one of these situations.

There is information on the Internet about everything from drugs to making

bombs. The United States government is trying to decide whether they should or should

not censor material on the Internet. The government does not censor information like this

in public libraries, so why should it censor this information on the Internet? The

government censors information like this on television though, so why wouldn't it censor

this on the Internet? If the government goes strictly by the First Amendment, it would not

censor anything on the Internet because that would be a violation of free speech. It is

obvious though, that the government does not always go directly by the First Amendment,

so this leaves the topic open to discussion.

Some people argue that this information would be dangerous if it got into the

wrong hands. Much of the information in the world would be dangerous if it got into

the wrong hands. Does this mean that we should perform background checks and

psychiatric tests on everyone before we give them any information? I believe it is

unethical to withhold information from anyone. All information should be given out

freely. It is up to the individual to decide how to use the knowledge they have.

Many people complain that there is a large number of sick and demented people on

the Internet. There are a large number of sick and demented people in the "real" world

as well. In fact, the same people who are on the Internet are in the real world, too. There

is not much we can do about them except arrest the people who take their sickness and

dementia too far and break the law.

Computers can be harmful and beneficial to people in many different ways. The

ways computers are beneficial are the most obvious. Computers can entertain us, they can

save us time and energy, as well as saving us from performing boring and laborious tasks.

Computers also can be physically harmful to people. People who use computers

too much can suffer from vision loss, to varying degrees, due to staring at the screen for

extended lengths of time . They can also have problems with the muscles in their hands

from typing so often. They can acquire back problems from sitting in chairs behind desks

at computer screens, all day long.

Some people say that computers allow humans to cheat. They give us the

answers. They allow us to stop thinking. They believe it is unethical for the computers to

do the work for us. These people may be right in that some humans allow computers to

do work for them, but then if people did not make use of the new inventions and time-

savers, farmers would still be plowing with a horse and we'd still be cooking on an open

fire. Until computers exhibit actual artificial intelligence, though, we are still the ones

doing the thinking. We program the computers to do what we want them to do.

In conclusion, I believe that, in most situations involving computers, the morality

or immorality of an action is up to the individual to decide, as it would be if computers

were not involved. We have seen, though, that there are many instances in which people

have, without a doubt, acted immorally and unethically.



1 Timothy O'Conner, "Computers Creating Ethical Dilemmas," USA Today Magazine

(September 1995) 7

2 Max Frankel, "Cyberrights," The New York Times Magazine (February 12, 1995) 26

3 O'Conner 7

4 James Coates, "Unabomber Case Underscores an On-Line Evil," Chicago Tribune (April

14, 1996) 5

5 Coates 5

6 O'Conner 7

7 Tom Forester, Computers in the Human Context (Cambridge: The MIT Press,1989) 403

8 Stephen A. Booht, "Doom Virus," Popular Mechanics (June 1995) 51

9 Philip Albinus, "Have You Seen This PC?," Home Office Computing (February 1996) 17


Report this article Ask About This Article


Loading...
More to Explore